I
don’t endorse these techniques. Arguments should be won on merit, not via some
cheap conversational ploy. On the other hand, if you appreciate cheap ploys,
here are some tricks you can use to win arguments:
1.
Declare victory and leave the room. It
resolves nothing, providing only a momentary one-up. Shallow but effective.
2. Throw a few Latin phrases into the
discourse. Example: Ergo ipso facto
persona non grata. Rough translation: Get outta here. Your opponent will be
thrown off balance just long enough for you to marshal a real argument. It’s a
slimy ploy but we’re not dealing with ethics here.
3.
Render your opponent’s point of view absurd. No matter how salient your
opponent’s point, respond by quacking like a duck. Warning: You render yourself
vulnerable to a charge of trivialization. Quacking is really not much more than
a smokescreen.
4.
Patronize your opponent. Feign agreement: “You’re absolutely right. Everything
you say is true.” Then yawn with elaborate ennui, like one of those smug
characters in a Noel Howard play, as if to say ‘Arguing with you is not worth
the trouble.’ Not widely used; you may get away with it.
5.
Engage in a shouting match. Can manifest itself in violence. The upside is
that you can shout pretty much whatever you want since logic is not a factor.
6.
Be a pacifist. Announcing “I’m not looking for a fight” gives you the moral
high ground, from which position you can launch a real donnybrook.
7. Accuse your opponent of filibustering.
Then take the floor and deliver a 60-minute diatribe on the evils of
filibustering.
8.
Don’t argue about religion. If someone says, “My religion involves snake
handling,” don’t ask, “Isn’t that dangerous?” Of course it is. That’s probably
the point.
9.
Ask an “objective” third party to settle the argument. Then invite one of
your drinking buddies to be the objective third party. This is a little
transparent and probably won’t work.
10.
Be honest and forthright, even if it means losing the argument. There are
worse things than losing an argument, such as winning by being a mindlessly
combative street fighter. Again, I do not endorse the above techniques. I may
use one of them occasionally, but only in intellectual desperation.
And
of course there’s the ultimate strong-arm tactic: If you can’t win the argument
on merit, attack the personality of your opponent. The thing is, even if you
win, you feel lousy afterward.
There
is such a thing as a principled argument from which both parties emerge
enhanced. I’ve had a few of those, and they’re rare and sometimes almost noble.
No comments:
Post a Comment